Blog

We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Marijuana Tax Controversy

The ongoing dispute in Michigan around the newly proposed 24% wholesale marijuana tax is unfolding into a significant case with potential nationwide implications. As the court proceedings commence, this case has garnered widespread attention due to its impact not only on cannabis pricing but also on the broader discourse regarding voter-approved legislation and taxation policies across the U.S.

Whether you're a cannabis consumer or concerned about state tax policies, the outcome of this case could set precedents influencing how other states establish, adjust, or justify similar tax constructs.

Details of Michigan's New Tax Proposal

Part of Michigan’s 2025-2026 budget involves instituting a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, poised to fund critical road improvements. This tax applies to transactions within the supply chain, prior to the product's appearance on retail shelves, aligning with the state's fiscal strategies.

Currently, Michigan levies two other taxes on marijuana:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail transactions, in place since the 2018 legalization by popular vote.

  • A 6% state sales tax across retail sales.

If enacted, Michigan could find itself among states with the most intricate cannabis tax structures.

Image 2

Reasons Behind the Legal Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) has filed a lawsuit labeling the tax as unconstitutional, primarily on these grounds:

The 2018 voter initiative for marijuana cannot be amended without a supermajority vote.

During the tax's passage, only a simple majority in the Legislature was achieved.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol articulated the industry's stance succinctly to Michigan Advance, emphasizing the protection of voter intentions.

Concerns also persist that such a tax could hike costs, pressure smaller enterprises, and steer consumers towards unregulated markets, echoing patterns observed in states such as California.

The State's Perspective

In defense, Michigan states the new tax is legal asserting:

  • The wholesale tax stands as an independent public act, not altering the existing voter-approved marijuana statute.

  • The state legislature holds the right to establish taxes in response to budgetary requirements.

  • Revenue generated addresses infrastructure funding, not cannabis regulation.

Should the courts uphold the state's view, this tax is slated to commence on January 1, 2026.

Image 3

Implications for Consumers and Small Businesses

This tax's survival or rejection holds considerable significance even for those not residing in Michigan, as it could influence cannabis tax frameworks elsewhere. Survival of the tax implies:

  • Escalation in wholesale prices.

  • Potential retail price increments to offset costs.

  • A shift towards more affordable, unregulated markets by some consumers.

  • Potential consolidation pressures on smaller operators due to financial strain.

An alternative outcome, where the tax is overturned, means the current cost-effective tax regime for Michigan cannabis remains unaffected.

What This Case Underlines for the Nation

Though isolated to Michigan, the case's ramifications extend to national considerations:

1. Testing Voter Law Limitations

If amendments bypass supermajority approvals, this could transform the operational dynamics of ballot initiatives nationwide.

2. Possible Adoption by Other States

States with underfunded infrastructure could be inclined towards similar taxation methods, pending Michigan's outcome.

3. Highlighting Variable Cannabis Tax Policies

Diverse state tax policies range from modest to prohibitive, influencing legal sales volumes.

This legal battle might shape future strategies for tax contestation in other U.S. jurisdictions.

Future Proceedings

The Michigan Court of Claims recently processed initial arguments with the judge expected to deliver a verdict soon. The case's eventual progression to the state Supreme Court remains plausible.

The impending ruling will have far-reaching impacts on Michigan’s legal canopy industry and guide state approaches to voter-led legislation, tax governance, and financial policies across the U.S.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.

James T. Neilson We love to chat!
Please feel free to use our Ai chat assistant or use the contact button to contact us.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully