We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.
Indiana’s decision to implement significant increases in cigarette taxes is more than a fiscal strategy—it reawakens the fervor of historical bootlegging roots. With the state elevating its cigarette prices, legislators are introducing stringent measures to thwart smugglers, echoing the Prohibition-era efforts against moonshiners and racketeers.
In many ways, we are revisiting the 1930s, with historical accounts showcasing mid‑1930s operations that dismantled bootleg beer and tobacco networks. Today’s focus has shifted from clandestine stills to interstate highways and shopping centers, where savvy consumers seek tax relief in neighboring states or exploit bulk deals.
States like Kentucky and Tennessee serve as lessons. Kentucky, with its exceptionally low cigarette tax of 10 cents per pack compared to Indiana's $1, has positioned itself as a prime smuggling hub, with routes extending across state borders. Similarly, Tennessee experienced a rise in bootleg cigarette operations after increasing taxes in the 2000s, akin to the classic “beer flats,” but now for tobacco.
The narrative is, however, more complex. A 2018 report by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Tobacconomics program explored the implications of cigarette tax hikes of 50 cents or more. Indiana’s 2007 increment from 55¢ to 99.5¢ per pack yielded a 43% revenue boost within a year, even as neighboring states showed minor declines, suggesting that higher taxes enhance net revenue despite smuggling issues.
This contemporary initiative mirrors historical pursuits, with Indiana targeting smoke smugglers as it once did still operators.
Starting July 1, Indiana’s cigarette tax will skyrocket, and newly passed legislation introduces robust enforcement strategies:
Criminalizing out-of-state bulk purchases, escalating high-volume offenses to felonies.
Advanced task forces—featuring Excise and state police—surveil shipments at toll points and warehouses.
Unannounced audits of wholesalers and retailers aim to intercept counterfeit tax stamps.
Predicted revenue impact: $290 million annually, allocated for public health initiatives.
Enforcement challenges loom large. Indiana’s proximity to low-tax states like Kentucky renders it susceptible to illicit trading. A Tax Foundation report lists Indiana among the top 10 states facing a potential uptick in cigarette smuggling post-tax hikes, due to “high potential for consumer evasion through border crossings and gray-market sales.”
Ohio, with its relatively lower cigarette taxes and extensive highway system, should also be monitored. A 2024 Mackinac Center study anticipates nearly 12% of cigarettes smoked in Indiana could derive from out-of-state purchases within the first year following the tax adjustment.
Illinois:
Illinois recently increased its nicotine-product tax to 45% of wholesale, heightening smuggling risks.
Approximately 30% of cigarettes consumed there are estimated to be smuggled across state lines.
The state enforces stringent penalties for unstamped packs—$20–$25 per package beyond nine—and began targeting bulk shipments after its 2019 tax hike led to a contraband surge (turn0news28, turn0search16).
New York:
With one of the country's highest cumulative taxes (state + NYC), New York has experienced smuggling rates over 50%, peaking at 61% during its latest $1-per-pack increase.
The Albany-based Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms and the state’s Tax Enforcement Office apply felony-level trafficking laws (Class D/E felonies for 10,000+ cigarettes).
Bootlegging has woven itself into the fabric of Indiana’s economy. During Prohibition, Indiana harbored some of the most active moonshine rings in the Midwest, especially in rural Southern Indiana counties like Lawrence, Dubois, and Orange. Moonshine frequently traversed under the mask of night along what locals called “Whiskey Roads.”
Todays landscape features packs instead of pints, yet the method remains unchanged: identify legislative loopholes, exploit geographic advantages, and discreetly move the merchandise.
Former Indiana Excise officer John Halverson captured this symmetry, stating, “Back then, it was stills in barns. Now it’s cartons in car trunks.”
Not everyone interprets the smuggling influx as a policy blunder. Public health experts argue that despite some smokers evading taxes, elevated prices generally lead to decreased smoking rates, notably among teenagers and low-income demographics.
Mike Seilback, National Assistant Vice President for Advocacy at the American Lung Association, remarked to The Indiana Capital Chronicle,
“Elevated tobacco prices are the most potent method to reduce smoking. We anticipate a significant number of Hoosiers quitting, with countless young people declining to start.”
Even with smuggling levels estimated between 10–30%, research indicates states can still realize meaningful net revenue enhancements post-tax hikes given that enforcement is effective. Indiana's own 2007 experience—a 41% sales decrease juxtaposed with a 43% revenue surge—demonstrates this phenomenon.
Indiana is committing wholeheartedly to this strategy. However, the result will depend on more than mere revenue forecasts. Can the state balance deterrence with effective enforcement? How will small-town vendors react? And can the new bootleggers—modern-day moonshine runners in SUVs and rented vans—stay ahead of the game?
Time will reveal. Currently, the spirit of the 1930s remains vibrant on the Midwest’s byways. The stakes have elevated, vehicles accelerated, and tax stamps made more secure—but the challenge persists as old as Indiana itself.
Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.
We care about the protection of your data.